• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
Wiki (mostly outdated)
New Wiki
Technology Chart
Rep hack list
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
Mactan Network
DarkStat
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules Faction Rules
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
QC| DisbandmentNotice (HISTORICAL)

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
QC| DisbandmentNotice (HISTORICAL)
Offline Kazinsal
10-30-2019, 02:51 AM,
#11
Wizard
Posts: 4,541
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2009

You were one of the last good factions on Discovery and if the reasons for your disbandment aren't a sign of the times then I don't know what is.

Pouring one out for you all. Sláinte.

(10-30-2019, 01:57 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: You can pretty much justify disbanding just about every faction with the points you made. The game is stuck in limbo and everyone is suffering. You'd honestly be better holding onto officialdom for the time being imo.

You know the saying that it's often less painful to just tear the band-aid off instead of peeling it as slowly as possible? It's well past time for Disco to just grip it and rip it, I think, for this exact reason.

Retired, permanently.
Reply  
Offline StDH
10-30-2019, 07:39 AM, (This post was last modified: 10-30-2019, 07:50 AM by StDH.)
#12
Member
Posts: 548
Threads: 100
Joined: Aug 2017

Best OC faction i've ever seen. You made Malta active and thriving both inRP and ooRP. The cooperation between QC and IRMM taught me how things work from political, tactical, inRP and ooRP sides. It was fun defending Malta against IMG, CR, Order, Nomads and whatever stuff tried to fly there. Thanks to you, Malta's relationship with GC- reached what many other factions purposely refused to. You didn't kneel to either Velvet's empty threats as they would like to. And together we destroyed IMG's Fort Siloso including many Gallic ships that appeared back then and even today, for which i received an award from you for the dedication.

It was an Honour.

  Reply  
Offline Durandal
10-30-2019, 07:50 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 5,105
Threads: 264
Joined: Apr 2009

Time to nuke Cuatroce stimulants from git, I guess. We were days away from a patch, too.
Reply  
Offline Kalhmera
10-30-2019, 07:53 AM,
#14
Sadistic Tentacle
Posts: 3,181
Threads: 541
Joined: Nov 2015

(10-30-2019, 12:45 AM)Cuatroce Wrote: 3. Slow development. QC has requested commodity as a faction perk quite a few months ago. No news, no reply, although it was crucial to our RP plans

(10-30-2019, 07:50 AM)Durandal Wrote: Time to nuke Cuatroce stimulants from git, I guess. We were days away from a patch, too.

Maybe you folks should communicate better with the community.

[Image: iytffEd.png]
Just as the constant increase of entropy is the basic law of the universe, so it is the basic law of life to struggle against entropy. - V. Havel
Amenhotep SRP Thread | Amenhotep Captains Log | Jean Holiday Dossier & Logs | Vermont History


Reply  
Offline Warhawk
10-30-2019, 08:15 AM,
#15
Member
Posts: 64
Threads: 9
Joined: Oct 2019

(10-30-2019, 07:53 AM)Kalhmera Wrote:
(10-30-2019, 12:45 AM)Cuatroce Wrote: 3. Slow development. QC has requested commodity as a faction perk quite a few months ago. No news, no reply, although it was crucial to our RP plans

(10-30-2019, 07:50 AM)Durandal Wrote: Time to nuke Cuatroce stimulants from git, I guess. We were days away from a patch, too.

Maybe you folks should communicate better with the community.

From the outside looking in, we're left wondering whether QC was impatient and premature, or the devs shafted them by leading them to believe no development was ever going to be made. The truth is usually somewhere in the middle, but around here you never know.

All doomsaying and deathforecasting aside, I agree with the premise of the OP to focus on unofficial factions. That's where you'll find what's left of the motivation, along with the indies that still give a little bit of fresh kick to the server.

[Image: E0HASy7.png]
Reply  
Offline -Rax-
10-30-2019, 08:20 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 548
Threads: 26
Joined: Mar 2016

I can be 1iC problem solved.
Jokes aside, that was actually a fun faction to fly with. RIP QC , and shortly rip L\- next time go fly indies

[Image: 2VbrSzU.png?1]
Reply  
Offline Reeves
10-30-2019, 08:30 AM,
#17
Redeemed by popularity
Posts: 2,940
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2016

(10-30-2019, 07:53 AM)Kalhmera Wrote:
(10-30-2019, 12:45 AM)Cuatroce Wrote: 3. Slow development. QC has requested commodity as a faction perk quite a few months ago. No news, no reply, although it was crucial to our RP plans

(10-30-2019, 07:50 AM)Durandal Wrote: Time to nuke Cuatroce stimulants from git, I guess. We were days away from a patch, too.

Maybe you folks should communicate better with the community.

As much as the staff is famous for their mismanagement or even outright inability to manage, I don't think this is necessarily their fault. You can't expect to be given an early scoop on whether or not something substantial might occur in the storyline purely because of how this community reacts to change of any sort. I understand why nothing was said, but at the same time it does feel silly that there was zero coordination and transparency regarding the request. And to then have that result in the deletion of the material that the team vested time in creating is a waste, and one that comes at the cost of the community at large given the nature of opportunity cost. That much is a little disappointing to me, and I think a little transparency could have gone a long way here, and the very least prevented a waste of development focus.

[Image: GAy6bGA.gif]
Reply  
Offline Durandal
10-30-2019, 08:42 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 5,105
Threads: 264
Joined: Apr 2009

Probably wouldn't be the worst idea to make the approved development requests subforum visible, with a notice that coming changes are pending implementation.
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
10-30-2019, 08:56 AM,
#19
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,154
Threads: 717
Joined: Jan 2013

I think OP's concern is more about the speed at which things are processed and the powerlessness they feel when it comes to faction roleplay. Giving visibility to the sub forum isn't a bad idea but I can't help but feel like that'd fail to address the issue(s) highlighted.

[Image: SQGerWV.png]
Reply  
Offline Neraxon
10-30-2019, 09:16 AM,
#20
Member
Posts: 518
Threads: 49
Joined: Apr 2016

(10-30-2019, 08:42 AM)Durandal Wrote: Probably wouldn't be the worst idea to make the approved development requests subforum visible, with a notice that coming changes are pending implementation.

That would be great, it would also stop the People from asking: Done yet >implement a random number of ? here<

[Image: aXlZguI.jpg]
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode